Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It is additionally important to note that granting of seniority to your civil servant without the actual duration of service nearly violates all the service composition as a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the legislation nor with the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made apparent that police is free to acquire action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal has not but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may perhaps then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may very well be considered through the court.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation consists of the names from the parties to the original case, the court in which the case was read, the date it absolutely was decided, plus the book in which it is actually recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly consist of italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
In certain jurisdictions, case legislation might be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when more info "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It can be nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there can be one or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for your decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage isn't thorough, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.